voneresnet-50-robust

Dapello et al., 2020

Benchmark scores

.464 average rank 1
28 benchmarks
.464
0
ceiling
best
median
.538 V1 rank 7
23 benchmarks
.538
0
ceiling
best
median
.376 FreemanZiemba2013.V1-pls v2 [reference] rank 3
.376
0
ceiling
best
median
sample 0 sample 1 sample 2 sample 3 sample 4 sample 5 sample 6 sample 7 sample 8 sample 9
.700 Marques2020 rank 37
22 benchmarks
.700
0
ceiling
best
median
.790 V1-orientation rank 54
7 benchmarks
.790
0
ceiling
best
median
.491 Marques2020_Ringach2002-or_bandwidth v1 rank 68
.491
0
ceiling
best
median
sample 0 sample 1 sample 2 sample 3 sample 4 sample 5 sample 6 sample 7 sample 8 sample 9
.923 Marques2020_Ringach2002-or_selective v1 rank 38
.923
0
ceiling
best
median
sample 0 sample 1 sample 2 sample 3 sample 4 sample 5 sample 6 sample 7 sample 8 sample 9
.764 Marques2020_Ringach2002-orth_pref_ratio v1 rank 31
.764
0
ceiling
best
median
sample 0 sample 1 sample 2 sample 3 sample 4 sample 5 sample 6 sample 7 sample 8 sample 9
.763 Marques2020_Ringach2002-cv_bandwidth_ratio v1 rank 52
.763
0
ceiling
best
median
sample 0 sample 1 sample 2 sample 3 sample 4 sample 5 sample 6 sample 7 sample 8 sample 9
.991 Marques2020_DeValois1982-pref_or v1 rank 4
.991
0
ceiling
best
median
sample 0 sample 1 sample 2 sample 3 sample 4 sample 5 sample 6 sample 7 sample 8 sample 9
.808 Marques2020_Ringach2002-opr_cv_diff v1 rank 50
.808
0
ceiling
best
median
sample 0 sample 1 sample 2 sample 3 sample 4 sample 5 sample 6 sample 7 sample 8 sample 9
.891 V1-spatial_frequency rank 6
3 benchmarks
.891
0
ceiling
best
median
.876 Marques2020_Schiller1976-sf_bandwidth v1 [reference] rank 23
.876
0
ceiling
best
median
sample 0 sample 1 sample 2 sample 3 sample 4 sample 5 sample 6 sample 7 sample 8 sample 9
.963 Marques2020_Schiller1976-sf_selective v1 [reference] rank 17
.963
0
ceiling
best
median
sample 0 sample 1 sample 2 sample 3 sample 4 sample 5 sample 6 sample 7 sample 8 sample 9
.835 Marques2020_DeValois1982-peak_sf v1 rank 11
.835
0
ceiling
best
median
sample 0 sample 1 sample 2 sample 3 sample 4 sample 5 sample 6 sample 7 sample 8 sample 9
.842 V1-response_selectivity rank 2
4 benchmarks
.842
0
ceiling
best
median
.813 Marques2020_FreemanZiemba2013-texture_sparseness v1 [reference] rank 21
.813
0
ceiling
best
median
sample 0 sample 1 sample 2 sample 3 sample 4 sample 5 sample 6 sample 7 sample 8 sample 9
.914 Marques2020_FreemanZiemba2013-texture_selectivity v1 [reference] rank 4
.914
0
ceiling
best
median
sample 0 sample 1 sample 2 sample 3 sample 4 sample 5 sample 6 sample 7 sample 8 sample 9
.798 Marques2020_Ringach2002-modulation_ratio v1 rank 1
.798
0
ceiling
best
median
sample 0 sample 1 sample 2 sample 3 sample 4 sample 5 sample 6 sample 7 sample 8 sample 9
.238 V1-receptive_field_size rank 62
2 benchmarks
.238
0
ceiling
best
median
.156 Marques2020_Cavanaugh2002-grating_summation_field v1 [reference] rank 65
.156
0
ceiling
best
median
sample 0 sample 1 sample 2 sample 3 sample 4 sample 5 sample 6 sample 7 sample 8 sample 9
.319 Marques2020_Cavanaugh2002-surround_diameter v1 [reference] rank 62
.319
0
ceiling
best
median
sample 0 sample 1 sample 2 sample 3 sample 4 sample 5 sample 6 sample 7 sample 8 sample 9
.401 V1-surround_modulation rank 52
1 benchmark
.401
0
ceiling
best
median
.401 Marques2020_Cavanaugh2002-surround_suppression_index v1 [reference] rank 52
.401
0
ceiling
best
median
sample 0 sample 1 sample 2 sample 3 sample 4 sample 5 sample 6 sample 7 sample 8 sample 9
.927 V1-texture_modulation rank 1
2 benchmarks