Sample stimuli

sample 0 sample 1 sample 2 sample 3 sample 4 sample 5 sample 6 sample 7 sample 8 sample 9

How to use

from brainscore_vision import load_benchmark
benchmark = load_benchmark("MajajHong2015.V4-pls")
score = benchmark(my_model)

Model scores

Min Alignment Max Alignment

Rank

Model

Score

1
.695
2
.671
3
.639
4
.625
5
.594
6
.586
7
.558
8
.555
9
.549
10
.549
11
.546
12
.546
13
.546
14
.546
15
.546
16
.545
17
.544
18
.543
19
.542
20
.541
21
.541
22
.541
23
.541
24
.540
25
.540
26
.539
27
.539
28
.539
29
.539
30
.539
31
.539
32
.539
33
.539
34
.539
35
.539
36
.539
37
.539
38
.539
39
.539
40
.538
41
.538
42
.538
43
.538
44
.537
45
.537
46
.537
47
.537
48
.537
49
.537
50
.536
51
.536
52
.536
53
.536
54
.536
55
.536
56
.536
57
.535
58
.535
59
.535
60
.535
61
.535
62
.534
63
.534
64
.534
65
.534
66
.534
67
.534
68
.534
69
.534
70
.533
71
.533
72
.533
73
.533
74
.532
75
.532
76
.532
77
.532
78
.530
79
.530
80
.530
81
.530
82
.530
83
.530
84
.530
85
.530
86
.530
87
.530
88
.530
89
.530
90
.529
91
.529
92
.529
93
.529
94
.529
95
.529
96
.529
97
.529
98
.529
99
.529
100
.529
101
.529
102
.529
103
.528
104
.528
105
.528
106
.528
107
.528
108
.527
109
.527
110
.527
111
.527
112
.527
113
.527
114
.527
115
.527
116
.527
117
.527
118
.527
119
.526
120
.526
121
.526
122
.526
123
.526
124
.526
125
.526
126
.526
127
.526
128
.525
129
.525
130
.525
131
.525
132
.524
133
.524
134
.524
135
.524
136
.524
137
.523
138
.523
139
.523
140
.523
141
.523
142
.523
143
.523
144
.523
145
.523
146
.523
147
.523
148
.522
149
.522
150
.522
151
.522
152
.522
153
.522
154
.522
155
.522
156
.522
157
.522
158
.521
159
.521
160
.521
161
.521
162
.521
163
.521
164
.521
165
.521
166
.521
167
.521
168
.521
169
.521
170
.521
171
.521
172
.520
173
.520
174
.520
175
.520
176
.520
177
.520
178
.520
179
.519
180
.519
181
.519
182
.519
183
.519
184
.519
185
.519
186
.519
187
.519
188
.518
189
.518
190
.518
191
.518
192
.518
193
.518
194
.518
195
.518
196
.518
197
.518
198
.518
199
.517
200
.517
201
.517
202
.517
203
.517
204
.517
205
.516
206
.516
207
.516
208
.516
209
.516
210
.516
211
.515
212
.515
213
.515
214
.515
215
.515
216
.515
217
.514
218
.514
219
.514
220
.514
221
.514
222
.514
223
.514
224
.514
225
.514
226
.514
227
.513
228
.513
229
.513
230
.513
231
.513
232
.513
233
.513
234
.513
235
.513
236
.512
237
.512
238
.512
239
.512
240
.512
241
.512
242
.511
243
.511
244
.511
245
.511
246
.511
247
.511
248
.510
249
.510
250
.510
251
.510
252
.510
253
.510
254
.510
255
.510
256
.510
257
.510
258
.510
259
.509
260
.509
261
.509
262
.509
263
.509
264
.509
265
.509
266
.509
267
.509
268
.509
269
.508
270
.508
271
.508
272
.508
273
.508
274
.508
275
.508
276
.507
277
.507
278
.507
279
.507
280
.507
281
.507
282
.507
283
.507
284
.506
285
.506
286
.506
287
.505
288
.505
289
.505
290
.505
291
.504
292
.504
293
.504
294
.504
295
.504
296
.503
297
.503
298
.503
299
.503
300
.503
301
.503
302
.502
303
.502
304
.502
305
.501
306
.501
307
.501
308
.501
309
.501
310
.500
311
.500
312
.500
313
.500
314
.500
315
.500
316
.500
317
.500
318
.499
319
.499
320
.499
321
.498
322
.498
323
.498
324
.498
325
.498
326
.497
327
.497
328
.497
329
.497
330
.497
331
.496
332
.496
333
.496
334
.496
335
.495
336
.495
337
.495
338
.494
339
.493
340
.493
341
.492
342
.492
343
.492
344
.492
345
.492
346
.492
347
.492
348
.492
349
.491
350
.491
351
.491
352
.491
353
.491
354
.491
355
.491
356
.491
357
.491
358
.490
359
.490
360
.490
361
.489
362
.488
363
.488
364
.487
365
.487
366
.487
367
.486
368
.485
369
.484
370
.484
371
.483
372
.482
373
.482
374
.482
375
.482
376
.481
377
.481
378
.480
379
.480
380
.480
381
.479
382
.477
383
.477
384
.477
385
.476
386
.474
387
.474
388
.471
389
.471
390
.471
391
.471
392
.469
393
.468
394
.467
395
.464
396
.464
397
.464
398
.463
399
.462
400
.462
401
.462
402
.462
403
.461
404
.461
405
.460
406
.460
407
.460
408
.460
409
.460
410
.460
411
.460
412
.460
413
.460
414
.460
415
.460
416
.459
417
.458
418
.457
419
.456
420
.455
421
.451
422
.451
423
.450
424
.449
425
.448
426
.446
427
.445
428
.444
429
.443
430
.442
431
.439
432
.437
433
.436
434
.436
435
.435
436
.434
437
.434
438
.433
439
.430
440
.426
441
.425
442
.425
443
.422
444
.420
445
.414
446
.408
447
.406
448
.405
449
.404
450
.403
451
.398
452
.397
453
.393
454
.392
455
.391
456
.391
457
.390
458
.390
459
.388
460
.388
461
.387
462
.387
463
.386
464
.386
465
.386
466
.385
467
.385
468
.385
469
.382
470
.381
471
.379
472
.377
473
.376
474
.375
475
.375
476
.369
477
.366
478
.342
479
.337
480
.336
481
.316
482
.306
483
.303
484
.294
485
.283
486
.263
487
.262
488
.181
489
.170
490
.165
491
.161
492
.155
493
.137
494
.088
495
.070
496
.065
497
.061
498
.060

Benchmark bibtex

@article {Majaj13402,
            author = {Majaj, Najib J. and Hong, Ha and Solomon, Ethan A. and DiCarlo, James J.},
            title = {Simple Learned Weighted Sums of Inferior Temporal Neuronal Firing Rates Accurately Predict Human Core Object Recognition Performance},
            volume = {35},
            number = {39},
            pages = {13402--13418},
            year = {2015},
            doi = {10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5181-14.2015},
            publisher = {Society for Neuroscience},
            abstract = {To go beyond qualitative models of the biological substrate of object recognition, we ask: can a single ventral stream neuronal linking hypothesis quantitatively account for core object recognition performance over a broad range of tasks? We measured human performance in 64 object recognition tests using thousands of challenging images that explore shape similarity and identity preserving object variation. We then used multielectrode arrays to measure neuronal population responses to those same images in visual areas V4 and inferior temporal (IT) cortex of monkeys and simulated V1 population responses. We tested leading candidate linking hypotheses and control hypotheses, each postulating how ventral stream neuronal responses underlie object recognition behavior. Specifically, for each hypothesis, we computed the predicted performance on the 64 tests and compared it with the measured pattern of human performance. All tested hypotheses based on low- and mid-level visually evoked activity (pixels, V1, and V4) were very poor predictors of the human behavioral pattern. However, simple learned weighted sums of distributed average IT firing rates exactly predicted the behavioral pattern. More elaborate linking hypotheses relying on IT trial-by-trial correlational structure, finer IT temporal codes, or ones that strictly respect the known spatial substructures of IT ({	extquotedblleft}face patches{	extquotedblright}) did not improve predictive power. Although these results do not reject those more elaborate hypotheses, they suggest a simple, sufficient quantitative model: each object recognition task is learned from the spatially distributed mean firing rates (100 ms) of \~{}60,000 IT neurons and is executed as a simple weighted sum of those firing rates.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT We sought to go beyond qualitative models of visual object recognition and determine whether a single neuronal linking hypothesis can quantitatively account for core object recognition behavior. To achieve this, we designed a database of images for evaluating object recognition performance. We used multielectrode arrays to characterize hundreds of neurons in the visual ventral stream of nonhuman primates and measured the object recognition performance of \>100 human observers. Remarkably, we found that simple learned weighted sums of firing rates of neurons in monkey inferior temporal (IT) cortex accurately predicted human performance. Although previous work led us to expect that IT would outperform V4, we were surprised by the quantitative precision with which simple IT-based linking hypotheses accounted for human behavior.},
            issn = {0270-6474},
            URL = {https://www.jneurosci.org/content/35/39/13402},
            eprint = {https://www.jneurosci.org/content/35/39/13402.full.pdf},
            journal = {Journal of Neuroscience}}

Ceiling

0.90.

Note that scores are relative to this ceiling.

Data: MajajHong2015.V4

2560 stimuli recordings from 88 sites in V4

Metric: pls