Sample stimuli

sample 0 sample 1 sample 2 sample 3 sample 4 sample 5 sample 6 sample 7 sample 8 sample 9

How to use

from brainscore_vision import load_benchmark
benchmark = load_benchmark("MajajHong2015.IT-pls")
score = benchmark(my_model)

Model scores

Min Alignment Max Alignment

Rank

Model

Score

1
.484
2
.476
3
.472
4
.471
5
.470
6
.468
7
.468
8
.467
9
.467
10
.465
11
.465
12
.463
13
.462
14
.461
15
.461
16
.461
17
.460
18
.460
19
.460
20
.459
21
.459
22
.459
23
.459
24
.458
25
.457
26
.457
27
.456
28
.456
29
.456
30
.455
31
.455
32
.455
33
.455
34
.455
35
.455
36
.454
37
.454
38
.454
39
.454
40
.454
41
.454
42
.453
43
.453
44
.453
45
.453
46
.452
47
.452
48
.452
49
.451
50
.451
51
.451
52
.451
53
.451
54
.451
55
.451
56
.450
57
.450
58
.450
59
.450
60
.450
61
.450
62
.450
63
.450
64
.449
65
.449
66
.449
67
.449
68
.449
69
.449
70
.449
71
.449
72
.448
73
.448
74
.448
75
.448
76
.448
77
.448
78
.448
79
.448
80
.447
81
.447
82
.447
83
.447
84
.447
85
.446
86
.446
87
.446
88
.446
89
.446
90
.446
91
.446
92
.446
93
.446
94
.446
95
.445
96
.445
97
.445
98
.445
99
.445
100
.445
101
.445
102
.445
103
.445
104
.445
105
.444
106
.444
107
.444
108
.444
109
.444
110
.444
111
.444
112
.444
113
.444
114
.444
115
.443
116
.443
117
.443
118
.443
119
.443
120
.443
121
.442
122
.442
123
.441
124
.441
125
.440
126
.440
127
.440
128
.440
129
.440
130
.440
131
.440
132
.440
133
.439
134
.439
135
.439
136
.439
137
.439
138
.439
139
.439
140
.439
141
.439
142
.439
143
.438
144
.438
145
.438
146
.438
147
.438
148
.438
149
.438
150
.438
151
.437
152
.437
153
.437
154
.437
155
.437
156
.437
157
.437
158
.437
159
.437
160
.436
161
.436
162
.436
163
.436
164
.435
165
.435
166
.435
167
.435
168
.435
169
.435
170
.434
171
.434
172
.434
173
.433
174
.433
175
.433
176
.433
177
.433
178
.433
179
.432
180
.432
181
.432
182
.432
183
.431
184
.431
185
.430
186
.430
187
.430
188
.430
189
.430
190
.430
191
.430
192
.429
193
.429
194
.428
195
.428
196
.428
197
.428
198
.428
199
.427
200
.427
201
.427
202
.427
203
.426
204
.426
205
.426
206
.426
207
.426
208
.425
209
.425
210
.425
211
.425
212
.425
213
.425
214
.425
215
.425
216
.425
217
.424
218
.424
219
.424
220
.423
221
.423
222
.423
223
.423
224
.423
225
.423
226
.423
227
.423
228
.422
229
.422
230
.422
231
.422
232
.421
233
.421
234
.421
235
.421
236
.420
237
.420
238
.419
239
.419
240
.419
241
.419
242
.419
243
.417
244
.417
245
.417
246
.417
247
.417
248
.416
249
.416
250
.416
251
.416
252
.416
253
.416
254
.416
255
.416
256
.416
257
.416
258
.415
259
.415
260
.415
261
.414
262
.414
263
.414
264
.414
265
.413
266
.413
267
.413
268
.413
269
.412
270
.412
271
.412
272
.412
273
.412
274
.411
275
.410
276
.410
277
.410
278
.410
279
.410
280
.410
281
.410
282
.409
283
.409
284
.408
285
.408
286
.408
287
.408
288
.408
289
.407
290
.406
291
.406
292
.406
293
.406
294
.406
295
.406
296
.405
297
.405
298
.405
299
.405
300
.405
301
.403
302
.402
303
.401
304
.401
305
.401
306
.400
307
.400
308
.400
309
.400
310
.400
311
.399
312
.399
313
.399
314
.399
315
.399
316
.399
317
.398
318
.397
319
.397
320
.397
321
.396
322
.396
323
.396
324
.396
325
.395
326
.395
327
.394
328
.393
329
.393
330
.393
331
.392
332
.392
333
.392
334
.391
335
.391
336
.391
337
.391
338
.390
339
.389
340
.389
341
.388
342
.388
343
.388
344
.388
345
.387
346
.387
347
.386
348
.386
349
.386
350
.385
351
.385
352
.385
353
.384
354
.384
355
.383
356
.382
357
.381
358
.381
359
.380
360
.380
361
.379
362
.379
363
.379
364
.378
365
.378
366
.378
367
.377
368
.377
369
.376
370
.376
371
.376
372
.376
373
.375
374
.374
375
.374
376
.374
377
.374
378
.374
379
.374
380
.374
381
.374
382
.374
383
.374
384
.373
385
.373
386
.372
387
.371
388
.370
389
.370
390
.369
391
.367
392
.367
393
.365
394
.365
395
.365
396
.364
397
.364
398
.363
399
.363
400
.361
401
.359
402
.359
403
.359
404
.359
405
.359
406
.358
407
.358
408
.357
409
.356
410
.355
411
.353
412
.349
413
.349
414
.348
415
.344
416
.343
417
.340
418
.340
419
.340
420
.339
421
.337
422
.337
423
.335
424
.335
425
.335
426
.334
427
.332
428
.331
429
.329
430
.329
431
.329
432
.328
433
.325
434
.324
435
.321
436
.319
437
.318
438
.317
439
.317
440
.314
441
.313
442
.312
443
.307
444
.306
445
.305
446
.301
447
.295
448
.294
449
.289
450
.289
451
.287
452
.283
453
.280
454
.279
455
.278
456
.273
457
.267
458
.266
459
.263
460
.263
461
.259
462
.254
463
.252
464
.234
465
.232
466
.228
467
.228
468
.228
469
.226
470
.221
471
.220
472
.216
473
.214
474
.213
475
.211
476
.211
477
.209
478
.207
479
.206
480
.205
481
.205
482
.202
483
.201
484
.199
485
.197
486
.192
487
.181
488
.180
489
.177
490
.177
491
.176
492
.176
493
.174
494
.173
495
.170
496
.170
497
.169
498
.158
499
.157
500
.151
501
.146
502
.143
503
.142
504
.136
505
.130
506
.122
507
.117
508
.117
509
.109
510
.107
511
.101
512
.089
513
.032
514
.022
515
.021
516
.013
517
.012
518

Benchmark bibtex

@article {Majaj13402,
            author = {Majaj, Najib J. and Hong, Ha and Solomon, Ethan A. and DiCarlo, James J.},
            title = {Simple Learned Weighted Sums of Inferior Temporal Neuronal Firing Rates Accurately Predict Human Core Object Recognition Performance},
            volume = {35},
            number = {39},
            pages = {13402--13418},
            year = {2015},
            doi = {10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5181-14.2015},
            publisher = {Society for Neuroscience},
            abstract = {To go beyond qualitative models of the biological substrate of object recognition, we ask: can a single ventral stream neuronal linking hypothesis quantitatively account for core object recognition performance over a broad range of tasks? We measured human performance in 64 object recognition tests using thousands of challenging images that explore shape similarity and identity preserving object variation. We then used multielectrode arrays to measure neuronal population responses to those same images in visual areas V4 and inferior temporal (IT) cortex of monkeys and simulated V1 population responses. We tested leading candidate linking hypotheses and control hypotheses, each postulating how ventral stream neuronal responses underlie object recognition behavior. Specifically, for each hypothesis, we computed the predicted performance on the 64 tests and compared it with the measured pattern of human performance. All tested hypotheses based on low- and mid-level visually evoked activity (pixels, V1, and V4) were very poor predictors of the human behavioral pattern. However, simple learned weighted sums of distributed average IT firing rates exactly predicted the behavioral pattern. More elaborate linking hypotheses relying on IT trial-by-trial correlational structure, finer IT temporal codes, or ones that strictly respect the known spatial substructures of IT ({	extquotedblleft}face patches{	extquotedblright}) did not improve predictive power. Although these results do not reject those more elaborate hypotheses, they suggest a simple, sufficient quantitative model: each object recognition task is learned from the spatially distributed mean firing rates (100 ms) of \~{}60,000 IT neurons and is executed as a simple weighted sum of those firing rates.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT We sought to go beyond qualitative models of visual object recognition and determine whether a single neuronal linking hypothesis can quantitatively account for core object recognition behavior. To achieve this, we designed a database of images for evaluating object recognition performance. We used multielectrode arrays to characterize hundreds of neurons in the visual ventral stream of nonhuman primates and measured the object recognition performance of \>100 human observers. Remarkably, we found that simple learned weighted sums of firing rates of neurons in monkey inferior temporal (IT) cortex accurately predicted human performance. Although previous work led us to expect that IT would outperform V4, we were surprised by the quantitative precision with which simple IT-based linking hypotheses accounted for human behavior.},
            issn = {0270-6474},
            URL = {https://www.jneurosci.org/content/35/39/13402},
            eprint = {https://www.jneurosci.org/content/35/39/13402.full.pdf},
            journal = {Journal of Neuroscience}}

Ceiling

0.82.

Note that scores are relative to this ceiling.

Data: MajajHong2015.IT

2560 stimuli recordings from 168 sites in IT

Metric: pls