Sample stimuli

sample 0 sample 1 sample 2 sample 3 sample 4 sample 5 sample 6 sample 7 sample 8 sample 9

How to use

from brainscore_vision import load_benchmark
benchmark = load_benchmark("MajajHong2015.IT-pls")
score = benchmark(my_model)

Model scores

Min Alignment Max Alignment

Rank

Model

Score

1
.484
2
.476
3
.472
4
.471
5
.470
6
.468
7
.468
8
.467
9
.467
10
.465
11
.465
12
.462
13
.461
14
.461
15
.461
16
.460
17
.460
18
.460
19
.459
20
.459
21
.459
22
.459
23
.457
24
.456
25
.456
26
.456
27
.455
28
.455
29
.455
30
.455
31
.455
32
.455
33
.454
34
.454
35
.454
36
.454
37
.454
38
.454
39
.453
40
.453
41
.453
42
.453
43
.452
44
.452
45
.452
46
.451
47
.451
48
.451
49
.451
50
.451
51
.451
52
.451
53
.450
54
.450
55
.450
56
.450
57
.450
58
.450
59
.450
60
.450
61
.449
62
.449
63
.449
64
.449
65
.449
66
.449
67
.449
68
.449
69
.448
70
.448
71
.448
72
.448
73
.448
74
.448
75
.448
76
.448
77
.447
78
.447
79
.447
80
.447
81
.447
82
.446
83
.446
84
.446
85
.446
86
.446
87
.446
88
.446
89
.446
90
.446
91
.446
92
.445
93
.445
94
.445
95
.445
96
.445
97
.445
98
.445
99
.445
100
.445
101
.445
102
.444
103
.444
104
.444
105
.444
106
.444
107
.444
108
.444
109
.444
110
.444
111
.443
112
.443
113
.443
114
.443
115
.443
116
.443
117
.442
118
.442
119
.441
120
.441
121
.440
122
.440
123
.440
124
.440
125
.440
126
.440
127
.440
128
.440
129
.439
130
.439
131
.439
132
.439
133
.439
134
.439
135
.439
136
.439
137
.439
138
.439
139
.438
140
.438
141
.438
142
.438
143
.438
144
.438
145
.438
146
.438
147
.437
148
.437
149
.437
150
.437
151
.437
152
.437
153
.437
154
.437
155
.437
156
.436
157
.436
158
.436
159
.435
160
.435
161
.435
162
.435
163
.435
164
.435
165
.434
166
.434
167
.434
168
.433
169
.433
170
.433
171
.433
172
.433
173
.433
174
.432
175
.432
176
.432
177
.432
178
.431
179
.431
180
.430
181
.430
182
.430
183
.430
184
.430
185
.430
186
.430
187
.429
188
.429
189
.428
190
.428
191
.428
192
.428
193
.428
194
.427
195
.427
196
.427
197
.427
198
.426
199
.426
200
.426
201
.426
202
.426
203
.425
204
.425
205
.425
206
.425
207
.425
208
.425
209
.425
210
.425
211
.425
212
.424
213
.424
214
.424
215
.423
216
.423
217
.423
218
.423
219
.423
220
.423
221
.423
222
.423
223
.422
224
.422
225
.422
226
.422
227
.421
228
.421
229
.421
230
.421
231
.420
232
.420
233
.419
234
.419
235
.419
236
.419
237
.419
238
.417
239
.417
240
.417
241
.417
242
.417
243
.416
244
.416
245
.416
246
.416
247
.416
248
.416
249
.416
250
.416
251
.416
252
.416
253
.415
254
.415
255
.415
256
.414
257
.414
258
.414
259
.414
260
.413
261
.413
262
.413
263
.413
264
.412
265
.412
266
.412
267
.412
268
.412
269
.411
270
.410
271
.410
272
.410
273
.410
274
.410
275
.410
276
.410
277
.409
278
.409
279
.408
280
.408
281
.408
282
.408
283
.408
284
.407
285
.406
286
.406
287
.406
288
.406
289
.405
290
.405
291
.405
292
.405
293
.405
294
.403
295
.402
296
.401
297
.401
298
.401
299
.400
300
.400
301
.400
302
.400
303
.399
304
.399
305
.399
306
.399
307
.398
308
.397
309
.397
310
.397
311
.396
312
.396
313
.395
314
.395
315
.393
316
.393
317
.392
318
.392
319
.391
320
.391
321
.391
322
.390
323
.389
324
.389
325
.388
326
.388
327
.388
328
.388
329
.387
330
.387
331
.386
332
.386
333
.386
334
.385
335
.385
336
.385
337
.384
338
.384
339
.383
340
.382
341
.381
342
.381
343
.380
344
.380
345
.379
346
.379
347
.379
348
.378
349
.378
350
.377
351
.377
352
.376
353
.376
354
.376
355
.376
356
.375
357
.374
358
.374
359
.374
360
.374
361
.374
362
.374
363
.374
364
.374
365
.374
366
.374
367
.373
368
.373
369
.372
370
.371
371
.370
372
.370
373
.369
374
.367
375
.367
376
.365
377
.365
378
.364
379
.364
380
.363
381
.363
382
.361
383
.359
384
.359
385
.359
386
.359
387
.359
388
.358
389
.358
390
.357
391
.356
392
.355
393
.353
394
.349
395
.349
396
.348
397
.344
398
.343
399
.340
400
.340
401
.340
402
.339
403
.337
404
.337
405
.335
406
.335
407
.334
408
.332
409
.331
410
.329
411
.329
412
.329
413
.328
414
.325
415
.324
416
.321
417
.319
418
.318
419
.317
420
.317
421
.314
422
.313
423
.312
424
.307
425
.306
426
.305
427
.301
428
.295
429
.294
430
.289
431
.289
432
.287
433
.283
434
.280
435
.279
436
.278
437
.273
438
.267
439
.266
440
.263
441
.263
442
.259
443
.254
444
.252
445
.234
446
.232
447
.228
448
.228
449
.228
450
.226
451
.221
452
.220
453
.216
454
.214
455
.213
456
.211
457
.211
458
.209
459
.207
460
.206
461
.205
462
.205
463
.202
464
.201
465
.199
466
.197
467
.192
468
.181
469
.180
470
.177
471
.177
472
.176
473
.176
474
.174
475
.173
476
.170
477
.170
478
.169
479
.158
480
.157
481
.151
482
.146
483
.143
484
.142
485
.136
486
.130
487
.122
488
.117
489
.117
490
.109
491
.107
492
.101
493
.089
494
.032
495
.022
496
.021
497
.013
498
.012
499

Benchmark bibtex

@article {Majaj13402,
            author = {Majaj, Najib J. and Hong, Ha and Solomon, Ethan A. and DiCarlo, James J.},
            title = {Simple Learned Weighted Sums of Inferior Temporal Neuronal Firing Rates Accurately Predict Human Core Object Recognition Performance},
            volume = {35},
            number = {39},
            pages = {13402--13418},
            year = {2015},
            doi = {10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5181-14.2015},
            publisher = {Society for Neuroscience},
            abstract = {To go beyond qualitative models of the biological substrate of object recognition, we ask: can a single ventral stream neuronal linking hypothesis quantitatively account for core object recognition performance over a broad range of tasks? We measured human performance in 64 object recognition tests using thousands of challenging images that explore shape similarity and identity preserving object variation. We then used multielectrode arrays to measure neuronal population responses to those same images in visual areas V4 and inferior temporal (IT) cortex of monkeys and simulated V1 population responses. We tested leading candidate linking hypotheses and control hypotheses, each postulating how ventral stream neuronal responses underlie object recognition behavior. Specifically, for each hypothesis, we computed the predicted performance on the 64 tests and compared it with the measured pattern of human performance. All tested hypotheses based on low- and mid-level visually evoked activity (pixels, V1, and V4) were very poor predictors of the human behavioral pattern. However, simple learned weighted sums of distributed average IT firing rates exactly predicted the behavioral pattern. More elaborate linking hypotheses relying on IT trial-by-trial correlational structure, finer IT temporal codes, or ones that strictly respect the known spatial substructures of IT ({	extquotedblleft}face patches{	extquotedblright}) did not improve predictive power. Although these results do not reject those more elaborate hypotheses, they suggest a simple, sufficient quantitative model: each object recognition task is learned from the spatially distributed mean firing rates (100 ms) of \~{}60,000 IT neurons and is executed as a simple weighted sum of those firing rates.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT We sought to go beyond qualitative models of visual object recognition and determine whether a single neuronal linking hypothesis can quantitatively account for core object recognition behavior. To achieve this, we designed a database of images for evaluating object recognition performance. We used multielectrode arrays to characterize hundreds of neurons in the visual ventral stream of nonhuman primates and measured the object recognition performance of \>100 human observers. Remarkably, we found that simple learned weighted sums of firing rates of neurons in monkey inferior temporal (IT) cortex accurately predicted human performance. Although previous work led us to expect that IT would outperform V4, we were surprised by the quantitative precision with which simple IT-based linking hypotheses accounted for human behavior.},
            issn = {0270-6474},
            URL = {https://www.jneurosci.org/content/35/39/13402},
            eprint = {https://www.jneurosci.org/content/35/39/13402.full.pdf},
            journal = {Journal of Neuroscience}}

Ceiling

0.82.

Note that scores are relative to this ceiling.

Data: MajajHong2015.IT

2560 stimuli recordings from 168 sites in IT

Metric: pls