Sample stimuli

sample 0 sample 1 sample 2 sample 3 sample 4 sample 5 sample 6 sample 7 sample 8 sample 9

How to use

from brainscore_vision import load_benchmark
benchmark = load_benchmark("ImageNet-C-noise-top1")
score = benchmark(my_model)

Model scores

Min Alignment Max Alignment

Rank

Model

Score

1
.742
2
.739
3
.734
4
.715
5
.708
6
.708
7
.700
8
.692
9
.689
10
.686
11
.671
12
.670
13
.651
14
.636
15
.634
16
.633
17
.631
18
.630
19
.622
20
.618
21
.614
22
.608
23
.597
24
.595
25
.594
26
.593
27
.589
28
.587
29
.582
30
.577
31
.570
32
.566
33
.561
34
.555
35
.554
36
.548
37
.548
38
.548
39
.539
40
.538
41
.534
42
.532
43
.527
44
.526
45
.523
46
.523
47
.517
48
.517
49
.514
50
.513
51
.513
52
.512
53
.511
54
.504
55
.499
56
.491
57
.484
58
.482
59
.476
60
.470
61
.462
62
.457
63
.456
64
.454
65
.448
66
.444
67
.442
68
.428
69
.426
70
.420
71
.413
72
.412
73
.408
74
.405
75
.404
76
.400
77
.399
78
.399
79
.396
80
.391
81
.390
82
.389
83
.389
84
.388
85
.388
86
.388
87
.387
88
.386
89
.385
90
.381
91
.381
92
.381
93
.380
94
.379
95
.378
96
.378
97
.376
98
.375
99
.374
100
.373
101
.369
102
.369
103
.366
104
.366
105
.365
106
.364
107
.363
108
.363
109
.362
110
.360
111
.358
112
.357
113
.355
114
.353
115
.349
116
.344
117
.344
118
.344
119
.341
120
.338
121
.337
122
.334
123
.332
124
.332
125
.332
126
.330
127
.327
128
.327
129
.325
130
.317
131
.316
132
.315
133
.309
134
.304
135
.304
136
.303
137
.302
138
.296
139
.291
140
.284
141
.284
142
.283
143
.282
144
.276
145
.272
146
.272
147
.269
148
.267
149
.265
150
.262
151
.262
152
.260
153
.256
154
.253
155
.253
156
.252
157
.252
158
.250
159
.248
160
.248
161
.248
162
.245
163
.244
164
.243
165
.242
166
.239
167
.237
168
.228
169
.228
170
.228
171
.228
172
.228
173
.227
174
.227
175
.226
176
.222
177
.218
178
.217
179
.215
180
.214
181
.213
182
.210
183
.210
184
.209
185
.209
186
.207
187
.204
188
.201
189
.199
190
.199
191
.196
192
.196
193
.195
194
.194
195
.194
196
.194
197
.194
198
.194
199
.194
200
.193
201
.193
202
.186
203
.186
204
.184
205
.182
206
.178
207
.178
208
.176
209
.174
210
.173
211
.170
212
.169
213
.166
214
.153
215
.153
216
.153
217
.153
218
.152
219
.152
220
.151
221
.151
222
.150
223
.148
224
.147
225
.146
226
.145
227
.141
228
.139
229
.139
230
.136
231
.131
232
.131
233
.130
234
.128
235
.125
236
.124
237
.123
238
.121
239
.118
240
.115
241
.114
242
.113
243
.111
244
.110
245
.109
246
.107
247
.105
248
.105
249
.104
250
.104
251
.104
252
.104
253
.100
254
.096
255
.092
256
.090
257
.087
258
.086
259
.079
260
.077
261
.077
262
.059
263
.053
264
.043
265
.012
266
.007
267
.006
268
.003
269
.003
270
.002
271
.001
272
.001
273
.001
274
.001
275
.001
276
.001
277
.001
278
.001
279
.001
280
.001
281
.001
282
.001
283
.001
284
.001
285
.001
286
.001
287
.001
288
.001
289
.000
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478

Benchmark bibtex

@ARTICLE{Hendrycks2019-di,
   title         = "Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions
                    and Perturbations",
   author        = "Hendrycks, Dan and Dietterich, Thomas",
   abstract      = "In this paper we establish rigorous benchmarks for image
                    classifier robustness. Our first benchmark, ImageNet-C,
                    standardizes and expands the corruption robustness topic,
                    while showing which classifiers are preferable in
                    safety-critical applications. Then we propose a new dataset
                    called ImageNet-P which enables researchers to benchmark a
                    classifier's robustness to common perturbations. Unlike
                    recent robustness research, this benchmark evaluates
                    performance on common corruptions and perturbations not
                    worst-case adversarial perturbations. We find that there are
                    negligible changes in relative corruption robustness from
                    AlexNet classifiers to ResNet classifiers. Afterward we
                    discover ways to enhance corruption and perturbation
                    robustness. We even find that a bypassed adversarial defense
                    provides substantial common perturbation robustness.
                    Together our benchmarks may aid future work toward networks
                    that robustly generalize.",
   month         =  mar,
   year          =  2019,
   archivePrefix = "arXiv",
   primaryClass  = "cs.LG",
   eprint        = "1903.12261",
   url           = "https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.12261"
}

Ceiling

1.00.

Note that scores are relative to this ceiling.

Data: ImageNet-C-noise

Metric: top1