Sample stimuli

sample 0 sample 1 sample 2 sample 3 sample 4 sample 5 sample 6 sample 7 sample 8 sample 9

How to use

from brainscore_vision import load_benchmark
benchmark = load_benchmark("ImageNet-C-weather-top1")
score = benchmark(my_model)

Model scores

Min Alignment Max Alignment

Rank

Model

Score

1
.762
2
.761
3
.756
4
.750
5
.734
6
.729
7
.726
8
.720
9
.718
10
.716
11
.685
12
.681
13
.678
14
.677
15
.677
16
.675
17
.673
18
.672
19
.672
20
.671
21
.670
22
.667
23
.657
24
.648
25
.646
26
.645
27
.633
28
.631
29
.624
30
.606
31
.605
32
.602
33
.601
34
.597
35
.596
36
.594
37
.594
38
.591
39
.589
40
.588
41
.587
42
.585
43
.582
44
.575
45
.573
46
.572
47
.570
48
.559
49
.556
50
.553
51
.553
52
.546
53
.540
54
.540
55
.540
56
.537
57
.529
58
.528
59
.528
60
.528
61
.520
62
.518
63
.516
64
.515
65
.513
66
.511
67
.510
68
.509
69
.509
70
.504
71
.504
72
.503
73
.503
74
.501
75
.499
76
.495
77
.489
78
.489
79
.488
80
.487
81
.487
82
.486
83
.486
84
.484
85
.482
86
.481
87
.479
88
.479
89
.474
90
.473
91
.472
92
.472
93
.471
94
.471
95
.470
96
.469
97
.466
98
.465
99
.465
100
.461
101
.461
102
.459
103
.458
104
.456
105
.455
106
.455
107
.453
108
.453
109
.450
110
.449
111
.448
112
.447
113
.445
114
.444
115
.442
116
.436
117
.433
118
.432
119
.430
120
.429
121
.429
122
.429
123
.422
124
.421
125
.420
126
.419
127
.418
128
.416
129
.415
130
.415
131
.413
132
.410
133
.403
134
.403
135
.402
136
.401
137
.399
138
.393
139
.393
140
.393
141
.391
142
.390
143
.389
144
.387
145
.386
146
.385
147
.384
148
.379
149
.377
150
.377
151
.373
152
.369
153
.368
154
.367
155
.366
156
.362
157
.360
158
.357
159
.355
160
.354
161
.353
162
.353
163
.351
164
.350
165
.350
166
.350
167
.347
168
.345
169
.344
170
.344
171
.344
172
.343
173
.343
174
.343
175
.343
176
.340
177
.340
178
.340
179
.337
180
.336
181
.333
182
.330
183
.327
184
.326
185
.322
186
.321
187
.319
188
.317
189
.315
190
.314
191
.310
192
.309
193
.304
194
.300
195
.298
196
.295
197
.293
198
.293
199
.293
200
.293
201
.293
202
.293
203
.290
204
.289
205
.288
206
.284
207
.284
208
.283
209
.282
210
.276
211
.275
212
.269
213
.269
214
.269
215
.269
216
.266
217
.262
218
.260
219
.255
220
.255
221
.255
222
.255
223
.252
224
.244
225
.243
226
.243
227
.242
228
.231
229
.230
230
.228
231
.228
232
.228
233
.228
234
.228
235
.228
236
.226
237
.224
238
.224
239
.220
240
.207
241
.201
242
.199
243
.198
244
.195
245
.188
246
.187
247
.186
248
.166
249
.159
250
.152
251
.145
252
.143
253
.142
254
.138
255
.136
256
.131
257
.126
258
.086
259
.008
260
.008
261
.006
262
.004
263
.003
264
.002
265
.002
266
.001
267
.001
268
.001
269
.001
270
.001
271
.001
272
.001
273
.001
274
.001
275
.001
276
.001
277
.001
278
.001
279
.001
280
.001
281
.001
282
.001
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478

Benchmark bibtex

@ARTICLE{Hendrycks2019-di,
   title         = "Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions
                    and Perturbations",
   author        = "Hendrycks, Dan and Dietterich, Thomas",
   abstract      = "In this paper we establish rigorous benchmarks for image
                    classifier robustness. Our first benchmark, ImageNet-C,
                    standardizes and expands the corruption robustness topic,
                    while showing which classifiers are preferable in
                    safety-critical applications. Then we propose a new dataset
                    called ImageNet-P which enables researchers to benchmark a
                    classifier's robustness to common perturbations. Unlike
                    recent robustness research, this benchmark evaluates
                    performance on common corruptions and perturbations not
                    worst-case adversarial perturbations. We find that there are
                    negligible changes in relative corruption robustness from
                    AlexNet classifiers to ResNet classifiers. Afterward we
                    discover ways to enhance corruption and perturbation
                    robustness. We even find that a bypassed adversarial defense
                    provides substantial common perturbation robustness.
                    Together our benchmarks may aid future work toward networks
                    that robustly generalize.",
   month         =  mar,
   year          =  2019,
   archivePrefix = "arXiv",
   primaryClass  = "cs.LG",
   eprint        = "1903.12261",
   url           = "https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.12261"
}

Ceiling

1.00.

Note that scores are relative to this ceiling.

Data: ImageNet-C-weather

Metric: top1