Sample stimuli

sample 0 sample 1 sample 2 sample 3 sample 4 sample 5 sample 6 sample 7 sample 8 sample 9

How to use

from brainscore_vision import load_benchmark
benchmark = load_benchmark("ImageNet-C-digital-top1")
score = benchmark(my_model)

Model scores

Min Alignment Max Alignment

Rank

Model

Score

1
.731
2
.710
3
.699
4
.676
5
.671
6
.671
7
.670
8
.664
9
.656
10
.654
11
.649
12
.646
13
.645
14
.641
15
.638
16
.638
17
.632
18
.631
19
.624
20
.619
21
.617
22
.615
23
.605
24
.601
25
.598
26
.598
27
.594
28
.591
29
.584
30
.581
31
.580
32
.580
33
.575
34
.575
35
.573
36
.572
37
.571
38
.568
39
.568
40
.567
41
.566
42
.562
43
.562
44
.561
45
.560
46
.560
47
.557
48
.555
49
.546
50
.541
51
.538
52
.534
53
.533
54
.530
55
.530
56
.529
57
.528
58
.528
59
.527
60
.526
61
.523
62
.520
63
.519
64
.516
65
.515
66
.514
67
.511
68
.508
69
.507
70
.507
71
.507
72
.506
73
.505
74
.504
75
.504
76
.502
77
.502
78
.501
79
.501
80
.501
81
.495
82
.493
83
.490
84
.489
85
.488
86
.488
87
.485
88
.485
89
.485
90
.484
91
.480
92
.477
93
.474
94
.473
95
.473
96
.472
97
.470
98
.468
99
.460
100
.458
101
.450
102
.449
103
.449
104
.449
105
.444
106
.439
107
.437
108
.435
109
.433
110
.432
111
.431
112
.428
113
.426
114
.421
115
.421
116
.419
117
.417
118
.409
119
.407
120
.407
121
.405
122
.404
123
.402
124
.399
125
.398
126
.393
127
.392
128
.391
129
.391
130
.391
131
.391
132
.390
133
.388
134
.388
135
.387
136
.386
137
.385
138
.384
139
.383
140
.383
141
.381
142
.379
143
.378
144
.377
145
.377
146
.375
147
.374
148
.373
149
.373
150
.372
151
.370
152
.369
153
.369
154
.368
155
.365
156
.360
157
.358
158
.357
159
.355
160
.350
161
.350
162
.348
163
.347
164
.342
165
.339
166
.338
167
.334
168
.333
169
.332
170
.328
171
.326
172
.324
173
.321
174
.319
175
.297
176
.297
177
.295
178
.295
179
.295
180
.295
181
.294
182
.290
183
.290
184
.290
185
.290
186
.288
187
.287
188
.278
189
.277
190
.277
191
.275
192
.273
193
.272
194
.272
195
.271
196
.269
197
.268
198
.261
199
.256
200
.251
201
.249
202
.246
203
.236
204
.228
205
.216
206
.213
207
.211
208
.203
209
.196
210
.193
211
.188
212
.028
213
.028
214
.006
215
.006
216
.004
217
.003
218
.002
219
.001
220
.001
221
.001
222
.001
223
.001
224
.001
225
.001
226
.001
227
.001
228
.001
229
.001
230
.001
231
.001
232
.001
233
.001
234
.001
235
.001
236
.001
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419

Benchmark bibtex

@ARTICLE{Hendrycks2019-di,
   title         = "Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions
                    and Perturbations",
   author        = "Hendrycks, Dan and Dietterich, Thomas",
   abstract      = "In this paper we establish rigorous benchmarks for image
                    classifier robustness. Our first benchmark, ImageNet-C,
                    standardizes and expands the corruption robustness topic,
                    while showing which classifiers are preferable in
                    safety-critical applications. Then we propose a new dataset
                    called ImageNet-P which enables researchers to benchmark a
                    classifier's robustness to common perturbations. Unlike
                    recent robustness research, this benchmark evaluates
                    performance on common corruptions and perturbations not
                    worst-case adversarial perturbations. We find that there are
                    negligible changes in relative corruption robustness from
                    AlexNet classifiers to ResNet classifiers. Afterward we
                    discover ways to enhance corruption and perturbation
                    robustness. We even find that a bypassed adversarial defense
                    provides substantial common perturbation robustness.
                    Together our benchmarks may aid future work toward networks
                    that robustly generalize.",
   month         =  mar,
   year          =  2019,
   archivePrefix = "arXiv",
   primaryClass  = "cs.LG",
   eprint        = "1903.12261",
   url           = "https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.12261"
}

Ceiling

1.00.

Note that scores are relative to this ceiling.

Data: ImageNet-C-digital

Metric: top1