Sample stimuli

sample 0 sample 1 sample 2 sample 3 sample 4 sample 5 sample 6 sample 7 sample 8 sample 9

How to use

from brainscore_vision import load_benchmark
benchmark = load_benchmark("ImageNet-C-digital-top1")
score = benchmark(my_model)

Model scores

Min Alignment Max Alignment

Rank

Model

Score

1
.790
2
.775
3
.761
4
.759
5
.755
6
.747
7
.743
8
.731
9
.720
10
.713
11
.710
12
.699
13
.685
14
.680
15
.677
16
.676
17
.671
18
.671
19
.670
20
.664
21
.656
22
.655
23
.654
24
.649
25
.646
26
.645
27
.641
28
.638
29
.638
30
.632
31
.631
32
.624
33
.619
34
.617
35
.615
36
.605
37
.601
38
.598
39
.598
40
.596
41
.594
42
.591
43
.586
44
.584
45
.581
46
.580
47
.580
48
.579
49
.575
50
.575
51
.573
52
.572
53
.571
54
.568
55
.568
56
.567
57
.566
58
.562
59
.562
60
.561
61
.560
62
.560
63
.557
64
.555
65
.546
66
.541
67
.538
68
.536
69
.534
70
.533
71
.530
72
.530
73
.529
74
.528
75
.528
76
.527
77
.526
78
.523
79
.520
80
.519
81
.516
82
.515
83
.514
84
.513
85
.511
86
.509
87
.509
88
.508
89
.507
90
.507
91
.507
92
.507
93
.506
94
.505
95
.505
96
.505
97
.504
98
.504
99
.503
100
.502
101
.502
102
.501
103
.501
104
.501
105
.500
106
.495
107
.495
108
.493
109
.490
110
.489
111
.488
112
.488
113
.485
114
.485
115
.485
116
.484
117
.480
118
.477
119
.474
120
.473
121
.473
122
.472
123
.470
124
.470
125
.468
126
.465
127
.461
128
.460
129
.459
130
.458
131
.454
132
.450
133
.449
134
.449
135
.449
136
.449
137
.444
138
.439
139
.437
140
.435
141
.433
142
.432
143
.431
144
.431
145
.430
146
.428
147
.426
148
.421
149
.421
150
.419
151
.417
152
.416
153
.409
154
.407
155
.407
156
.405
157
.404
158
.402
159
.399
160
.398
161
.393
162
.392
163
.391
164
.391
165
.391
166
.391
167
.390
168
.388
169
.388
170
.387
171
.386
172
.385
173
.384
174
.383
175
.383
176
.383
177
.381
178
.379
179
.378
180
.377
181
.377
182
.375
183
.374
184
.373
185
.373
186
.372
187
.371
188
.370
189
.369
190
.369
191
.368
192
.365
193
.360
194
.358
195
.357
196
.355
197
.350
198
.350
199
.350
200
.348
201
.347
202
.347
203
.347
204
.347
205
.347
206
.347
207
.345
208
.342
209
.340
210
.339
211
.338
212
.335
213
.334
214
.333
215
.332
216
.328
217
.326
218
.324
219
.321
220
.319
221
.297
222
.297
223
.295
224
.295
225
.295
226
.295
227
.295
228
.294
229
.290
230
.290
231
.290
232
.290
233
.288
234
.287
235
.278
236
.277
237
.277
238
.275
239
.273
240
.272
241
.272
242
.271
243
.269
244
.268
245
.261
246
.256
247
.251
248
.249
249
.246
250
.236
251
.235
252
.228
253
.216
254
.213
255
.211
256
.203
257
.196
258
.193
259
.188
260
.028
261
.028
262
.006
263
.006
264
.004
265
.003
266
.002
267
.001
268
.001
269
.001
270
.001
271
.001
272
.001
273
.001
274
.001
275
.001
276
.001
277
.001
278
.001
279
.001
280
.001
281
.001
282
.001
283
.001
284
.001
285
.001
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479

Benchmark bibtex

@ARTICLE{Hendrycks2019-di,
   title         = "Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions
                    and Perturbations",
   author        = "Hendrycks, Dan and Dietterich, Thomas",
   abstract      = "In this paper we establish rigorous benchmarks for image
                    classifier robustness. Our first benchmark, ImageNet-C,
                    standardizes and expands the corruption robustness topic,
                    while showing which classifiers are preferable in
                    safety-critical applications. Then we propose a new dataset
                    called ImageNet-P which enables researchers to benchmark a
                    classifier's robustness to common perturbations. Unlike
                    recent robustness research, this benchmark evaluates
                    performance on common corruptions and perturbations not
                    worst-case adversarial perturbations. We find that there are
                    negligible changes in relative corruption robustness from
                    AlexNet classifiers to ResNet classifiers. Afterward we
                    discover ways to enhance corruption and perturbation
                    robustness. We even find that a bypassed adversarial defense
                    provides substantial common perturbation robustness.
                    Together our benchmarks may aid future work toward networks
                    that robustly generalize.",
   month         =  mar,
   year          =  2019,
   archivePrefix = "arXiv",
   primaryClass  = "cs.LG",
   eprint        = "1903.12261",
   url           = "https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.12261"
}

Ceiling

1.00.

Note that scores are relative to this ceiling.

Data: ImageNet-C-digital

Metric: top1